The true litigation in the criminal field in relation to the speech imposed by the justice system within the province of Santa Elena

Abstract

The following investigation deciphers the true litigation in the criminal field, putting criteria, observations, critical analysis and play on words to persuade the judge or judges of criminal guarantees in comparison to a programmed, bureaucratic and unfriendly speech with human rights by of prosecutors, public defenders and lawyers in free practice who, because they are not sanctioned with fines or sanctions, are gradually changing the authentic lawyer for a mechanized one. The objective of this research was achieved, by the incorporation, prior analysis of law, doctrine and the collection of information from relevant scientific articles on the subject. This research is of a qualitative nature with a descriptive approach, in turn, to specify results statistically, a survey was carried out among lawyers within the country so that they respond to concerns that are constantly raised in the world of litigation by those who know of law and citizenship that acclaims a true technical defense. Having as a result, that lawyers in free exercise currently do not litigate adequately and that their interventions respond to an invasive criminal procedural system and not to the interests of the parties in dispute within a litigation.

Keywords: criminal, doctrine, prosecutors, lawyers.